Везде
THE ART MARKET AND THE BOUNDARIES OT ART
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE ART MARKET AND THE BOUNDARIES OT ART
Annotation
PII
S086904990000616-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Konstantin Sokolov  Yury Osokin
Edition
Issue 4
Pages
165-176
Abstract
The authors examine the situation on the art-market, noting that at present the market turned into a massive industry producing and promoting contemporary art objects. Their value is determined solely by commercial factors, which in terms of aesthetics and craftsmanship often have no relations to the quality of the works presented. As a result, the art market is flooded with all kinds of readymades, collages, objects in the style of pop art and other imitations of fine art. This situation is largely connected with the crisis of modern art history, which is not able to offer scientifi c criteria for identifying the essential features of art and artistic creativity. The science is removed by marketing and logistics. However, previous history of artistic practice, serves as the basis for determining the nature of art and its philosophy, gives us hope that the science of art still be able to determine, at least in general terms, the boundaries of art with respect to the realities of our time.
Keywords
art market, contemporary art, art critic, public relations, artistic criteria, the crisis art history
Date of publication
01.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
937
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Amerikanskaya filosofiya iskusstva (1997): Antologiya. Pod red. B. Dzemidoka i B. Orlova.
 Ekaterinburg: Odissej, Delovaya kniga.
 Apresyan A. (2010) Britanskie khudozhniki pytayutsya spasti iskusstvo (http://rus.ruvr. ru/2010/10/04/23943447/).
 Begma Yu.S., Shabel'nikova D.V. (2010) Sekrety tsenoobrazovaniya na artrynke // Ehkonomi- cheskij zhurnal. № 20. S. 128–132.
 Botkina A.P. (1951) P.M. Tret'yakov v zhizni i v iskusstve. M.: Iskusstvo.
 Gel'man M. (2005) Kak prodavat' iskusstvo // Otechestvennye zapiski. № 4 (http://magazines. russ.ru/oz/2005/4/2005_4_28.html).
 Gel'man M. (2000) Muzei: obraz, rynok, vlast' (http://azbuka.gif.ru/important/guelman- museums-obraz/).
 Gobozova A. (2009) PR na rynke sovremennogo izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva, s. 1–20 (pr-club. com/assets/fi les/pr_lib/pr_papers/gorbozova.doc).
 Grojs B. (1991) Apologiya rynka // Dekorativnoe iskusstvo SSSR. 1991. № 2. S. 1–15.
 Grojs B. (1999) Skorost' iskusstva // Mir Dizajna. № 33. S. XIX–XXI.
 Dolganova K. (2011) Artrynok: teoriya (http://artandyou.ru/category/art/post/art_ryinok_ teoriya).
 Dubova O. (2010) Aktual'noe iskusstvo i rynok (http://www.rospisatel.ru/dubova-aktualnoje. htm).
 Kagan M.S. (1997) Filosofskaya teoriya tsennosti. SPb.: TOO TK Petropolis.
 Kantor A. (2002) Iskusstvoznanie i khudozhestvennaya kritika // Edinyj khudozhestvennyj rejting. Vyp. 5. (http://rating.artunion.ru/article20.htm).
 Kantor M. (2007) Prodavtsy vakuuma // Ehkspert. № 9 (550). 5 marta 2007 (http://expert.ru/ expert/2007/09/prodavcy_vakuuma).
 Kantor-Kazovskaya L. (2008) O vkuse moloka: sovremennoe iskusstvo i ehsteticheskij dis- kurs // Zerkalo № 31 (http://zerkalo-litart.com/?p=967).
 Karpov A.V. (2004) Khudozhestvennyj rynok: voprosy teorii, istorii, metodologii. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGUP.
 Kutejnikova Z. (2009) Na artrynok cherez skandal i ehpatazh (http://timetolive.ru/p/april09/ zoya/).
 Lopukhova O. (2009) V ozhidanii Togo // Oktyabr'. № 3 (http://magazines.russ.ru/october/2009/3/ lo8.html).
 Lysakova A.A. (2013) Contemporary art kak predmet potrebleniya v sisteme art-rynka novej- shego vremeni, s. 230–239 (http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2013/02/11/1251419942/Lysakova_2011_5. pdf) Makeenkova A.V. (2012) Ponimanie iskusstva kak osnovnaya zadacha sovremennogo iskusstvoznaniya // Khudozhestvennaya kul'tura. № 3. (http://sias.ru/publications/magazines/kultura/vypusk-3/ teoriya-hudozhestvennoy-kultury/588.html).
 Malyshev I.V. (2003) Krizis ehstetiki // 10 ehsse o KhKh v . (http://www.proza. ru/2010/02/16/1217).
 Malyshev I.V. (2013) Iskusstvo i filosofiya: ot moderna k postmodernu. M.: Pro- bel-2000.
 Matveeva I. (2010) Literaturnaya kritika kak sredstvo prodvizheniya khudozhestvennoj literatury // Matveeva I.Yu. Medijnaya podderzhka chteniya: prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Litera, 2010. S. 21–35.
 Mirovoj artrynok v pervom polugodii 2014 (http://www.artinua.com/index. php?code=news&news_id=276).
 Petukhov Yu. (2011) Khudozhestvennyj Rynok. Mify i Real'nost', s. 1 –9 (http:// modernartconsulting.ru/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/08/ModernArtConsulting-art-market. pdf).
 Piroshka D. (2011) Prodano! Iskusstvo i den'gi. SPb.: Limbus Press, OOO Izdatel'stvo K. Tublina (http://www.twirpx.com/fi le/1481158).
 Rud'ev A. (2009) Sovremennyj khudozhnik – ehto uspeshnyj biznesmen (http://www.newslab. ru/news/article/281607).
 Sarab'yanov D.V. (1995) Nekotorye metodologicheskie voprosy iskusstvoznaniya v situatsii istoricheskogo rubezha // Iskusstvoznanie. № 1–2. C. 5–33.
 Sokolov B.G. (2013) Neobychnyj vzglyad na sovremennoe iskusstvo. Beseda s zaveduyuschim kafedroj ehstetiki filosofskogo fakul'teta SPbGU d.filos.n., prof. B.G. Sokolovym (http:// klauzura.ru/2013/03/olga-nesmeyanova-beseda-s-zaveduyushhim-kafedroi-e-stetiki-fi losofskogo-f- ta-spbgu-professorom-b-g-sokolovym/).
 Sushkova-Irina Ya.I. (2010) Sozdateli i potrebiteli sovremennoj khudozhestvennoj kul'- tury: tipologicheskij analiz. Avtoref. dis. k.kul't. M.: MGPU s. 1–28 (http://cheloveknauka. com/v/85519/a?#?page=1).
 Tompson D. (2009) Kak prodat' za $12 millionov chuchelo akuly. Skandal'naya pravda o sov- remennom iskusstve i auktsionnykh domakh. M.: Tsentrpoligraf (http://karraba.net/kak-prodat-za- 12-millionov-dollarov-chuchelo-akulyi.html).
 Weitz M. (1956) The Role of a Theory in Aesthetics / / Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 15 (http://louisdoulas.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/The-Role-of-Theory-in- Aesthetics.pdf).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate