Везде
Market Exchange and Share-Out Practices in the Anabar District of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) [Rynochnyi obmen i praktiki delezha v Anabarskom raione Respubliki Sakha (Yakutia)].
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Market Exchange and Share-Out Practices in the Anabar District of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) [Rynochnyi obmen i praktiki delezha v Anabarskom raione Respubliki Sakha (Yakutia)].
Annotation
PII
S0869-54150000338-4-1
DOI
10.31857/S50000338-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Caduc Evgeniy 
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
111-127
Abstract
One of the distinctive features of the market economy as it currently functions in the Anabar district(also known as the Dolgan-Evenki district) of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) is the intertwinement —in fact, quite often, interdependence — of the market exchange practices and the share-out practices (deliozh), the latter having long been a common form of traditional economy among various peoplesof the North. Charitable activities, which are mixed or combined with trading by some entrepreneurs in the region, may be seen as a new emergent form of share-out. There are other aspects of the market relations that may also be considered specific to the region, such as the reliance on informal connections and networks in conducting business and interest-free commodity credits.
Keywords
Sakha Republic, Yakutia, Yakut, Dolgan, Evenki, Even, indigenous peoples of the North, share-out, distribution, exchange, gift, barter, market, loan, reciprocity
Number of purchasers
4
Views
560
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Humphrey C. An Anthropology View of Barter in Russia // The Vanishing Rouble: Barter Networks
and Non-Monetary Transactions in Post-Soviet Societies / Ed. P. Seabright. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 71–90.
Ferguson J. The Bovine Mystique: Power, Property and Livestock in Rural Lesotho // Man. 1985.
Vol. 20 (4). P. 647–674.
Peterson N. Demand Sharing: Reciprocity and Pressure for Generosity among Foragers // American
Antropologist. 1993. Vol. 95 (4). P. 860–874.
Stammler F. Capitalism in the Tundra or Tundra in Capitalism? Specific Purpose Money from
Herders, Antlers and Traders in Yamal // Economic Spaces of Pastoral Production and
Commodity Systems: Markets and Livelihoods / Eds. J. Gertel, R. Le Heron. L.: Ashgate, 2011.
P. 231–246.
Ventsel A. Reindeer, Rodina and Reciprocity: Kinship and Property Relations in a Siberian village //
Halle Studies in the Anthropology of Eurasia. Vol. 7. Berlin: LIT, 2005.
Ventsel A. Siberian Movements: How Money and Goods Travel in and out of Northwestern Sakha //
Folklore. 2011. Vol. 49. P. 113–130. https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2011.49.ventsel
Woodburn J. C. “Sharing Is Not a Form of Exchange”: An Analysis of Property Sharing in
Immediate-Return Hunter-Gatherer Societies // Property Relations: Renewing the
Anthropological Tradition / Ed. C. Hann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
P. 48–63.
Yudin G., Pavlyutkin I. Recording the Ambiguity // Cultural Studies. 2015. Vol. 29. № 5–6.
P. 807–826.
Ziker J.P. Peoples of the Tundra: Northern Siberians in the Post-Communist Transition. Prospect
Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 2002.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate