CATEGORICAL APPARATUS OF THE "ROMAN REVOLUTION" STUDIES: THE TERM QUASI CIVITAS IN THE JAKOV YU. MEZHERITSKIY RESEARCH
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
CATEGORICAL APPARATUS OF THE "ROMAN REVOLUTION" STUDIES: THE TERM QUASI CIVITAS IN THE JAKOV YU. MEZHERITSKIY RESEARCH
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000339-8-1
DOI
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
 
Pages
752-768
Abstract
The article gives a critical review of the Mezheritskiy's interpretation of the Roman community in the Late Republican period (and even since third century BC) as a quasi civitas. Both the wording of this term and its sense are analysed. The author agrees with Mezheritskiy that civitas Romana is populus Romanus, i.e. population consisting of Roman citizens; civitas and res publica are different terms, civitas being a subject and res publica an object of its possession. The latter consisted of material and non-material components including political structure, which varied during the long period of the existence of the civitas. Analyzing Mezheritskiy's arguments in favour of regarding the second-first century BC Roman community as а quasi civitas, the author of the article finds them unreliable. She argues that «to restore the republic» under Augustus' rule (if res publica is understood as something belonging to civil community) was possible only if the subject that possessed it, i.e. civitas, persisted. Therefore, the cause of the «Roman revolution» was not a transformation of civitas into quasi civitas, but a crisis of its political structure as an element of the res publica. The author of this article claims that by introducing the term quasi civitas into the categorical apparatus of his research Mezheritskiy did not strengthen the theoretical basis of his study, as the term came into contradiction with its content.
Keywords
Civitas, res publica, quasi civitas, “Roman Revolution”, “Restored Republic”
Number of purchasers
4
Views
540
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


Bispham, E. 2007: From Asculum to Actium. Oxford.
Brunt, P.A. 1987: Italian Manpower 225 B.C. – AD14. Oxford.
Dementyeva, V.V. 2010a: [Roman civitas of Republican period]. In: V.V. Dementyeva, I.E. Surikov (eds), Antichnyy polis. Kurs lektsiy [Ancient Polis. A Course of Lectures]. Moscow, 130–175.
Dement'eva V.V. Rimskaya civitas respublikanskoj ehpokhi. V kn.: V.V. Dement'eva, I.E. Surikov (otv. red.), Antichnyj polis. Kurs lektsij. M., 130–175.
Dementyewa, V.V. 2010b: Die römische „Meritokratie« und die Entwiecklung politischer Repräsentation. In: V. Dement’eva, T. Schmitt (Hrsgg.), Volk und Demokratie im Altertum. Göttingen, 107–141.
Dementyeva, V.V. 2012: [Cross-cultural interaction, a political integration and a local identities conservation in Roman Italy at the Republican times: a research problem]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki [Journal of Demidov State University of Yaroslavl. Series: Humanities] 4/2, 119–126.
Dement'eva, V.V. Mezhkul'turnoe vzaimodejstvie, politicheskaya integratsiya i sokhranenie lokal'nykh identichnostej v rimskoj Italii respublikanskogo vremeni: problemy izucheniya. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki 4/2, 119–126.
Drexler, H. 2009: Res publica. In: O.V. Kharkhordin (ed.), Res publica: Istoriya ponyatiya [A History of the Concept. Coll. of art.; Transl. from German]. Saint Petersburg, 67–170.
Dreksler, Kh. Res publica. V kn.: O.V. Kharkhordin (nauch. red.), Res publica: Istoriya ponyatiya. Sb. statej; Per. s nem. SPb., 66–170.
Hin, S. 2013: The Demography of Roman Italy: Population Dynamics in an Ancient Conquest Society, 201 BCE – 14 CE. Cambridge.
Hodgson, L. 2017: Res Publica and the Roman Republic: ‘Without Body or Form’. Oxford.
Konstan, D. 2015: Reading the past (On comparison). In: D. Hammer (ed.), A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic. Malden–Oxford–Chichester, 8–20.
Ligt, L. de 2012: Peasants, Citizens and Soldiers: Studies in the Demographic History of Roman Italy, 225 BC – AD100. Cambridge.
Linke, B. 2006: Bürger ohne Staat? In: M. Jehne, R. Pfeilschifter (Hrsgg.), Herrschaft ohne Integration? Rom und Italien in republikanischer Zeit (Studien zur Alten Geschichte, Bd 4). Frankfurt am Main, 65–94.
Makhlayuk, A.V. 2010: [Polis-republican structures and traditions in the Principate]. In: V.V. Dementyeva, I.E. Surikov (eds), Antichnyy polis. Kurs lektsiy [Ancient Polis. A Course of Lectures]. Moscow, 176–226.
Makhlayuk, A.V. Polisno-respublikanskie struktury i traditsii v ehpokhu printsipata. V kn.: V.V. Dement'eva, I.E. Surikov (otv. red.), Antichnyj polis. Kurs lektsij. M., 176–226.
Makhlayuk, A.V. 2015: [Transition from Republic to Empire and the problem of Roman civilization]. In: E.G. Megaryan (ed), Transformatsionnye protsessy v epochu printsipata. Vklyuchenie Rima v osevoye vremya. [Transformation Processes in the Principate. Inclusion of Rome into Axial Time]. Erevan, 92–120.
Makhlayuk, A.V. Perekhod ot Respubliki k Imperii i problema rimskoj tsivilizatsii. V kn.: E.G. Margaryan (otv. red.), Transformatsionnye protsessy v ehpokhu printsipata. Vklyuchenie Rima v osevoe vremya. Sb. statej. Erevan, 92–120.
Makhlayuk A.V. 2017: [Restoration as a revolution] (Ja. Yu. Mezheritskiy. «Vosstanovlennaya respublika» imperatora Avgusta. Moscow, 2016). Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 2, 450–458.
Makhlayuk, A.V. Restavratsiya kak revolyutsiya (Ya.Yu. Mezheritskij. «Vosstanovlennaya respublika» imperatora Avgusta. M., 2016). VDI 2, 450–458.
Mason, H.J. 1974: Greek Terms for Roman Institutions. A Lexicon and Analysis. Toronto.
Mezheritskiy Ja. Yu. 2016: “Vosstanovlennaya respublika” imperatora Avgusta [Emperor Augustus’ “Restored Republic”]. Moscow.
Mezheritskij Ya.Yu. «Vosstanovlennaya respublika» imperatora Avgusta. M.
Scheidel, W. 2006: The demography of Roman state formation in Italy. In: M. Jehne, R. Pfeilschifter (Hrsgg.), Herrschaft ohne Integration? Rom und Italien in republikanischer Zeit (Studien zur Alten Geschichte, Bd 4). Frankfurt am Main, 207–226.
Scheidel, W. 2008: Roman population size: the logic of the debate. In: L. de Ligt, S. Northwood (eds), People, Land, and Politics. Leiden, 17–70.
Scheidel, W. 2013: Italian manpower. Journal of Roman Archaeology 26, 678–687.
Schofield, M. 2015: Liberty, equality, and authority: a political discourse in the Later Roman republic. In: D. Hammer (ed.), A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic. Malden–Oxford–Chichester, 113–128.
Smyshlyaev, A.L. 2017: [“Rule in a civilian way” in understanding of Greek authors and in practice of Roman power]. Istoricheskiy vestnik [Journal of History]: “Roma: dominatio civilis” 19, 10–49.
Smyshlyaev, A.L. «Pravlenie po-grazhdanski» v predstavlenii grecheskikh pisatelej i v praktike rimskoj vlasti. Istoricheskij vestnik. «Rim: dominatio civilis» 19, 10–49.
Stark, R. 2009: Res publica. In: O.V. Kharkhordin (ed.), Res publica: Istoriya ponyatiya [A History of the Concept. Coll. of art.; Transl. from German]. Saint Petersburg, 7–66.
Shtark, R. Res publica. V kn.: O.V. Kharkhordin (nauch. red.), Res publica: Istoriya ponyatiya. Sb. statej; Per. s nem. SPb., 7–66.
Surikov, I.E. 2006: Ostrakism v Afinakh [Ostracism in Athens]. Moscow.
Surikov, I.E. Ostrakizm v Afinakh. M.
Surikov, I.E. 2015: Antichnaya Gretsiya: Mentalnost’, religiya, kultura [Ancient Greece: Mentality, religion, culture]. Moscow.
Surikov, I.E. Antichnaya Gretsiya: Mental'nost', religiya, kul'tura. M.
Surikov, I.E. 2016: [La specifica del diritto pubblico greco antico in comparazione con quello romano]. IVS ANTIQVVM. Drevneye pravo [Ancient Law] 1(33), 8–44.
Surikov, I.E. Spetsifika drevnegrecheskogo gosudarstvennogo prava v sravnenii s rimskim. IVS ANTIQVVM. Drevnee pravo 1(33), 8–44.
Syme, R. 1939: The Roman Revolution. Oxford.
Utchenko, S.L. 1977: Politicheskie ucheniya Drevnego Rima [The political doctrines of Ancient Rome]. Moscow.
Utchenko, S.L. Politicheskie ucheniya Drevnego Rima. M.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate