Везде
ADAPTATION OF THE TEMPORAL EXPERIENCE OF PLEASURE SCALE: CROSS-CULTURAL AND CROSS-SITUATIONAL DIFFERENCES
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ADAPTATION OF THE TEMPORAL EXPERIENCE OF PLEASURE SCALE: CROSS-CULTURAL AND CROSS-SITUATIONAL DIFFERENCES
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000338-8-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000338-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
MARGARITA ALFIMOVA  TATIANA Lezheiko VERA GOLIMBET
Abstract
The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) has been designed to measure the ability of experiencing pleasure at different time points - while waiting for a future reward (anticipatory pleasure) and when directly engaged in a pleasurable activity (consummatory pleasure). The purpose of this study was to adapt TEPS for Russian population and to compare psychometric characteristics of the Russian version to those in the western and eastern cultures. Basic (434 people aged between 16 and 77 years, 57% women) and replication (354 conscripts, only men, aged 18-27 years) samples were used. We analyzed the distribution of the average values of the integrated indicators of the scale, internal consistency and retest reliability; confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses of the TEPS as well as assessment of convergent and divergent validity of the Ant and Con subscales were conducted. It is shown that the Russian version of the TEPS has psychometric properties and two-factor structure comparable to those of the original English version of the scale, and is sensitive to a situational context that influences availability of rewarding stimuli.
Keywords
hedonic capacity, anticipatory pleasure, consummatory pleasure, motivation, TEPS, reliability, validity.
Number of purchasers
8
Views
722
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Berezin F.B., Miroshnikov M.P., Rozhanec R.B. Metodika mnogostoronnego issledovanija lichnosti v klinicheskoj medicine i psihogigiene. Moscow.: Medicina, 1976. (in Russian)
    2. 

  2. Enikolopov S.N., Efremov A.G. Aprobacija biosocial’noj metodiki Kloninzhera “Struktura haraktera i temperamenta”. Materialy 1 mezhdunarodnoj konferencii, posvjashhjonnoj pamjati B.V. Zejgarnik. Moscow, 2001. P. 104–105. (in Russian)
    3. 

  3. Berridge K.C. Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiol. Behav. 2004. V. 81. № 2. P. 179–209.
    4. 

  4. Bouchard T.J., McGue M. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Human Psychological Differences. Journ. Neurobiol. 2003. V. 54. № 1. P. 4–45.
    5. 

  5. Chan R.C., Shi Y.F., Lai M.K., Wang Y.N., Wang Y., Kring A.M. The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS): exploration and confirmation of factor structure in a healthy Chinese sample. PLoSOne. 2012. V. 7. № 4. e35352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035352.
    6. 

  6. Chan R.C.K., Wang Y., Huang J. et al. Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure in schizophrenia: Cross-cultural validation and extension. Psychiatry Res. 2010. V. 175. P. 181–183.
    7. 

  7. Dowd E.C., Barch D.M. Anhedonia and emotional experience in schizophrenia: neural and behavioral indicators. Biol. Psychiatry. 2010. V. № 10. P. 902–911.
    8. 

  8. FavrodJ., Ernst F., Giuliani F., Bonsack C. Validation française de l’échelle d’expérience temporelle du Plaisir. L’Encéphale. 2009. V. 35. № 3. P. 241–248.
    9. 

  9. Gard D.E., Germans Gard M.K., Kring A.M., John O.P. Anticipatory and consummatory experience of pleasure: A scale development study. Journ.Res. Pers. 2006. V. 40. № 6. P. 1086–1102.
    10. 

  10. Gard D.E., Kring A.M., Germans Gard M., Horan W.P., Green M.F. Anhedonia in schizophrenia: Distinctions between anticipatory and consummatory pleasure. Schizophr. Res. 2007. V. 93. № 1–3. P. 253–260.
    11. 

  11. Ho P.M., Cooper A.J., Hall P.J., Smillie L.D. Factor structure and construct validity of the temporal experience of pleasure scales. Journ. Pers Assess. 2015. V. 97. № 2. P. 200–208.
    12. 

  12. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternative. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999. V. 6. № 1. P. 1–55.
    13. 

  13. Klein D.F. Endogenomorphic depression. A conceptual and terminological revision // Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1974. V. 31. № 4. P. 447–454.
    14. 

  14. Knyazev G.G., Slobodskaya H.R., Wilson G.D. Comparison of construct validity of the Gray–Wilson personality questionnaire and the BIS/BAS scales. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2004. V. 37. № 8. P. 1565–1582.
    15. 

  15. Kring A.M. Emotion in schizophrenia: Old mystery, new understanding. Cur. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1999. V. 8. № 5. P. 160–163.
    16. 

  16. Kring A.M., Barch D.M. The motivation and pleasure dimension of negative symptoms: neural substrates and behavioral outputs. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014. V. 24. № 5. P. 725–736.
    17. 

  17. Lee I.A., Preacher K.J. Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. URL: http://quantpsy.org/corrtest/ corr (data obrascheniya: 11.10.2016).
    18. 

  18. Stratta P., Pacifico R., Riccardi I., Daneluzzo E., Rossi A. Il piacere anticipatorio e consumatorio: uno studio di validazione della versione italiana della Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale. Giorn. Ital. Psicopat. 2011. V. 17. P. 322–327.
    19.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate