Везде
THE ATTITUDES TOWARD GLOBAL RISKS: SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE ATTITUDES TOWARD GLOBAL RISKS: SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000338-8-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000338-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
T. Nestik  A. Zhuravlev
Abstract
The attitudes toward global risks are considered as personal or group characteristics of anticipating, experiencing and interpreting not only the global risks themselves, but also the activities of in-group or out-group that are directed on preventing or creating and using them. The article examines the psychological aspects that affect evaluation and prevention of global risks: lack of experience in autobiographic or collective memory; discounting them as a distant future; oversimplified solutions provoked by collective anxiety; need for assets that are hard to mobilize quickly (social trust, global identity, group reflexivity); corruption of personal and group belief in ability to control own future; psychological ambivalence of means of prevention; embeddedness in the inter-group relations and susceptibility to manipulations. The structure of individual and group attitudes toward global risks are proposed (motivational, cognitive, affective, behavioral). The socio-psychological antecedents of global risks prevention are analysed. A positive image of future and clarification of opportunities are more effective in global long-term risk prevention then alarmist approach. The role of global social identity and online communities in global risks prevention is discussed. The directions for further psychological research are proposed.
Keywords
global risks, catastrophes, collective representations of future, cognitive biases, time perspective, trust, group reflexivity, online communities, global identity
Number of purchasers
8
Views
751
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Armand A.D., Lyuri D.I., Zherikhin V.V. i dr. Anatomiya krizisov. M.: Nauka, 1999.
    2. 

  2. Bovina I.B. Risk: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskij vzglyad // Psikhologiya i pravo. 2011. № 4. S. 1–10.
    3. 

  3. Volkov Yu.I. Global'nye riski XXI veka // Problemy analiza riskov. 2015. T. 12. № 2. S. 6–20.
    4. 

  4. Vorob'yov Yu.L., Malinetskij G.G., Makhutov H.A. Upravlenie riskom i ustojchivoe razvitie. Chelovecheskoe izmerenie // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2000. № 6. S. 150–162.
    5. 

  5. Gavrilov K.A. Sotsiologiya vospriyatiya riska. Opyt rekonstruktsii klyuchevykh podkhodov. M.: IS RAN, 2009.
    6. 

  6. Giddens Eh. Sud'ba, risk i bezopasnost' // THESIS. 1994. № 5. S. 107–134.
    7. 

  7. Danlehp R.I. Obydennoe vospriyatie global'nogo riska // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 11: Sotsiologiya. Referativnyj zhurnal. 2001. № 2. S. 52–57.
    8. 

  8. Desyatov I.V., Malinetskij G.G., Manenkov S.K., Mitin N.A., Ototskij P.L., Tkachev V.N., Shishov V.V. Kognitivnye tsentry kak informatsionnye sistemy dlya strategicheskogo prognozirovaniya // Informatsionnye tekhnologii i vychislitel'nye sistemy. 2011. № 1. S. 65–81.
    9. 

  9. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A. Gruppovaya refleksivnost': osnovnye podkhody i perspektivy issledovanij // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2012. Tom 33. № 4. S. 27–38.
    10. 

  10. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A., Sosnin V.A. Psikhologicheskie aspekty strategicheskoj stabil'nosti i yadernogo sderzhivaniya // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2011. Tom 32. № 2. S. 5–24.
    11. 

  11. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A., Sosnin V.A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty geopoliticheskoj stabil'nosti i yadernogo sderzhivaniya v KhKhI veke. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
    12. 

  12. Kornilova T.V. Prinyatie reshenij i  risk: psikhologiya neopredelennosti. Ehlektronnoe izdanie po proektu RGNF URL: www.rfh.ru/downloads/ Books/144693004 g. Moskva, 2014.
    13. 

  13. Kuprejchenko A.B., Zhuravlev A.L. Tsennostno-smyslovaya ratsional'nost' ehkonomicheskogo povedeniya naseleniya sovremennoj Rossii // Psikhologiya v ehkonomike i upravlenii. 2010. № 2. S. 15–23.
    14. 

  14. Lumann N. Ponyatie riska  // THESIS. 1994. № 5. S. 135–160.
    15. 

  15. Malinetskij G.G. Perspektivy i tekhnologii upravleniya strategicheskimi riskami v pervoj polovine XXI veka // Strategiya grazhdanskoj zaschity: problemy i issledovaniya. 2013. № 2. S. 15–17.
    16. 

  16. Malinetskij G.G. Razmyshleniya o  nemyslimom  // Turchin A.V. Struktura global'noj katastrofy. Riski vymiraniya chelovechestva v XXI veke. M., 2008. S. 18–37.
    17. 

  17. Morozova E.V., Miroshnichenko I.V. Setevye soobschestva v usloviyakh chrezvychajnykh situatsij: novye vozmozhnosti dlya grazhdan i dlya vlasti // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 1. S. 140–152.
    18. 

  18. Nazaretyan A.P. Antropologiya nasiliya i  kul'tura samoorganizatsii: Ocherki po ehvolyutsionno-istoricheskoj psikhologii. Izd. 2-e, ispr. M.: Izdvo LKI, 2008.
    19. 

  19. Nazaretyan A.P. Tekhnologiya i psikhologiya: k kontseptsii ehvolyutsionnykh krizisov // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1993. № 3. S. 82–93.
    20. 

  20. Nazaretyan A.P. Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste Universal'noj istorii. M.: PER SEh, 2001.
    21. 

  21. Neklessa A.I. Serdtse t'my: travmaticheskaya inklyuziya // Aktual'nye problemy ehkonomiki i prava. 2015. № 2. S. 280–295.
    22. 

  22. Nestik T.A. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya vremeni. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014.
    23. 

  23. Nestik T.A. Global'naya identichnost' v obschestve riska  // Nauka. Kul'tura. Obschestvo. 2015. № 4. S. 130–140.
    24. 

  24. Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti kollektivnogo tvorchestva v setevykh soobschestvakh // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2016. T. 37. № 2. S. 19–28.
    25. 

  25. Rossiya v  globaliziruyuschemsya mire: mirovozzrencheskie i sotsiokul'turnye aspekty /Otv. red. V.S. Stepin. M.: Nauka, 2007.
    26. 

  26. Seligmen A. Problema doveriya. M.: Ideya-Press, 2002.
    27. 

  27. Sosnin V.A., Nestik T.A. Sovremennyj terrorizm: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskij analiz. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2008.
    28. 

  28. Stolyar V.Yu. Doverie kak instrument upravleniya global'nym riskom // Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena. 2008. № 82–1. S. 330–336.
    29. 

  29. Turchin A.V. O  vozmozhnykh prichinakh nedootsenki riskov gibeli chelovecheskoj tsivilizatsii // Problemy upravleniya riskami i bezopasnost'yu. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza RAN. T. 31. S. 266–305.
    30. 

  30. Turchin A.V. Problema stabil'nogo razvitiya i perspektivy global'nykh katastrof // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2010. № 1. S. 156–163.
    31. 

  31. Turchin A.V., Batin M.A. Futurologiya. XXI vek: bessmertie ili global'naya katastrofa? M.: BINOM. Laboratoriya znanij, 2013.
    32. 

  32. Yanitskij O.N. Modernizatsiya v Rossii v svete kontseptsii “obschestva riska” // Kuda idet Rossiya? Obschee i osobennoe v sovremennom razvitii / Pod red. T. Zaslavskoj. M.: Intertsentr, 1997.
    33. 

  33. Beck U. Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes // The risk society and beyond. Critical issues for social theory. Ed. by B. Adam, U. Beck and J. Loon. L.: SAGE Publications, 2005. P. 211–229.
    34. 

  34. Bore I.-L. K., Reid G. Laughing in the Face of Climate Change? Satire as a Device for Engaging Audiences // Public Debate Science Communication. 2014 V. 36. N.4. P. 454–478.
    35. 

  35. Bostrom N. Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority  // Global Policy. 2013. N. 4. P. 15–31. doi:10.1111/1758–5899.12002.
    36. 

  36. Bostrom N., Cirkovic M.M. Introduction // Global Catastrophic Risks. Ed. by Bostrom N. & Cirkovic M.M. L.N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2008. P. 1–29.
    37. 

  37. Douglas M., Wildavsky A.B. Risk and Culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
    38. 

  38. Friedman R.S., Foerster J. Effects of Motivational Cues on Perceptual Asymmetry: Implications for Creativity and Analytical Problem Solving // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005. V. 88. N. 2. P. 263–275.
    39. 

  39. Gaertner S.L., Dovidio J.F. Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press / Taylor & Francis, 2000.
    40. 

  40. Giddens A. Living in a Post-Traditional Society  // Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity, 1994. P. 56–109.
    41. 

  41. Hamilton S.B., Chavez E.L., Keitlin W.G. Thoughts of Armageddon: The relationship between nuclear threat attitudes and cognitive / emotional responses // International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, pp. 189–207.
    42. 

  42. Hoffman A. How Culture Shapes the Climate Change Debate. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015.
    43. 

  43. Luhmann N. Risk: A Sociological Theory. N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 1993.
    44. 

  44. Myers T., Nisbet M., Maibach E., Leiserowitz A. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change // Climatic Change. 2012. N. 113. P. 1105–1112.
    45. 

  45. O’Neill S., Nicholson-Cole S. “Fear won’t do it”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations // Science Communication. 2009. V. 30. N.3 P. 355–279.
    46. 

  46. Sauermann H., Franzoni Ch. Crowd Science User Contribution Patterns and Their Implications (January 6, 2015). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), January 20, 2015. V. 112. N. 3. http://ssrn.com/ abstract=2545945
    47. 

  47. Schunk D., Winter J. The relationship between risk attitudes and heuristics in search tasks: a laboratory experiment // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2009. V. 71. P. 347–360.
    48. 

  48. Slovic P. The More Who Die, the Less We Care  // Slovic P. The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception (Earthscan Risk in Society). N.Y.: Earthscan, 2013.
    49. 

  49. Stoknes P.E. What We Think About When We Try Not To Think About Global Warming: Toward a New Psychology of Climate Action. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2015.
    50. 

  50. The Global Risks Report 2016, 11th Edition. World Economic Forum, 2016. http://reports.weforum.org/ global-risks­2016/
    51. 

  51. Weber E.U. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why globalwarming does not scare us (yet) // Climatic Change. 2006. V. 77. N. 1/2. P. 103–120.
    52. 

  52. Yudkowsky E. Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgement of global risks // Global Catastrophic Risks. Ed. by Bostrom N. & Cirkovic M.M. L.-N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2008. P. 91–119.
    53.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate