Везде
MODERNIZATION IN RUSSIA AND AROUND: SYNOPSIS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MODERNIZATION IN RUSSIA AND AROUND: SYNOPSIS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oleg N. Yanitsky 
Edition
Volume 325 Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 5
Pages
136-145
Abstract
The author evaluates the project of Russian modernization and the possibilities of its implementation, the impact of historical conditions, the state and civil society on it; analyzes the “starting situation”, the corridor of economic and social opportunities, the degraded industrial system of the Soviet period. It is concluded that if the existing trends continue, Russia's modernization can only be "conservative" in ideology, elitist and “insular” in scale, and technocratically oriented in the vector of values.
Keywords
modernization, information society, networks, social and environmental metabolism, civil society, Russia
Date of publication
05.05.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
485
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Fischer-Kowalski M., H. Haberl (eds.) Socioecological Transitions and Global Change. Trajectories of Social Metabolism and Land Use. Vienna: Univ. of Vienna. 2007.
 2. Pivovarov Yu.S. Polnaya gibel' vser'ez: Izbrannye raboty. M.: ROSSPEhN. 2004.
 3. Pivovarov Yu.S. Russkaya politika v ee istoricheskom i kul'turnom otnosheniyakh. M.: ROSSPEhN. 2006.
 4. Yanitsky O. Russia Environmentalism. The Yanitsky Reader. Moscow: Taus. 2010.
 5. Yanitskij O. Sotsiologiya riska. M.: Izdatel'stvo LVS. 2003.
 6. Yanitskij O. Rossiya kak obschestvo riska: metodologiya analiza i kontury kontseptsii // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2004. № 2. S. 5–15.
 7. Karaganov S. “Lovushki” kholodnoj vojny // Rossijskaya gazeta, 29 avgusta 2008 g., s. 5.
 8. Yanitskij O. Evropejskie lidery o dolgosrochnoj perspektive Evropejskogo Soyuza // Mir i politika. 2008. № 11. S. 41–52.
 9. Pozhary nad stranoj vse yarche // Internet-zhurnal ESO–HR, № 3655, 7 avgusta 2010 g.
 10. Beck U. World Risk Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press. 1999.
 11. Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1994.
 12. Yanitskij O. Sotsiologiya i riskologiya // Yanitskij O.N., otv. red. Rossiya: riski i opasnosti “perekhodnogo” obschestva. Moskva: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 1998. s. 9–35.
 13. Bauman Z. Wasted Lives. Modernity and its Outcasts. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. 2004.
 14. Yanitskij O. Risk-solidarnosti: rossijskaya versiya // Inter. 2004. № 2–3. S. 52–62.
 15. Archer M. Sociology and Crisis (The silence of sociologists). Paper presented at 17th ISA congress (Gothenburg, Sweden, July, 11–17, 2010).
 16. Castells M. Materials for an Explanatory Theory for the Network Society // British Journal of Sociology, 2000. Vol. 51. No 1. rr. 5–24.
 17. Castells M. Networks and Netwars. Paper presented at 17th ISA congress (Gothenburg, Sweden, July, 11–17, 2010).
 18. Diani M., D. McAdam (eds.). Social Movements and Networks. Relational Approach to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003.
 19. Abalkin L., Barysheva A., Sorokin D. (red.). Gumanisticheskie orientiry Rossii. M.: Institut ehkonomiki RAN. 2002.
 20. Likhachev D.S. Ehkologiya kul'tury // Znanie-sila. 1982. № 6. s. 9–12.
 21. Niedhart D., Rucht D. The Analysis of Social Movements: the State of the Art and some Perspectives // Rucht D. (ed). Research on Social Movements, pp. 421–64, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. 1991.
 22. Sztompka P. The Sociology of Social Change. Blackwell: Oxford, UK and Cambridge, 1993.
 23. Tilly Ch. Social Movements, 1768–2004. London: Paradigm Publicher. 2004.
 24. Zayavlenie koalitsii nepravitel'stvennykh organizatsij “Za Bajkal!” // Internet-zhurnal ESO-NR, № 3591, 4 iyunya 2010 g., s. 1.
 25. Bykov Dm. Mafiya ili sekta? // Novaya Gazeta. 08.11.2009. S. 2–3.
 26. Malashenko A. Postsovetskie gosudarstva Yuga i interesy Moskvy // Pro et Contra. 2000. T. 5. № 3. S. 34–47.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate