Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 5 :: LANGUAGES OF SOCIOLOGY: VERBOSITY OR CACOPHONY? - Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Home>Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 5>LANGUAGES OF SOCIOLOGY: VERBOSITY OR CACOPHONY?

LANGUAGES OF SOCIOLOGY: VERBOSITY OR CACOPHONY?

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

LANGUAGES OF SOCIOLOGY: VERBOSITY OR CACOPHONY?

Annotation

PII

S0132-16250000616-3-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Denis Podvoyskiy Send message

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0

Edition

Volume 325 Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 5

Pages

3-9

Abstract

The problems of the conceptual apparatus of sociological science are discussed. The epistemological phenomenon of "pluralism" of dictionaries of sociology is considered in the context of its implications. The article describes the features of the language of sociology and its functioning in modern conditions, the relationship with the natural language environment, the processes of fixing and rejecting innovations. It is concluded that it is necessary to overcome the fragmentation of the conceptual apparatus of sociology.

Keywords

the conceptual framework, social Sciences, language, science, terminological innovations, terminatoralpha, dictionary of sociology

Date of publication

05.05.2011

Number of purchasers

1

Views

496

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Podvoyskiy D. LANGUAGES OF SOCIOLOGY: VERBOSITY OR CACOPHONY? // Sotsialogicheski issledovania. – 2011. – V. 325. – Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 5 C. 3-9 .
MLA	Podvoyskiy, Denis "LANGUAGES OF SOCIOLOGY: VERBOSITY OR CACOPHONY?." Sotsialogicheski issledovania. 325.5 (2011).:3-9.
APA	Podvoyskiy D. (2011). LANGUAGES OF SOCIOLOGY: VERBOSITY OR CACOPHONY?. Sotsialogicheski issledovania. vol. 325, no. 5, pp.3-9

References

Additional sources and materials

1. Barchunova T.V. Neiskushennyj fal'sifikatsionizm? [Rets. na: Dzherri D., Dzherri Dzh. Bol'shoj tolkovyj sotsiologicheskij slovar'. V 2-kh t. M.: Veche, AST, 1999] //Sotsiol.zhurnal. 2000. 1/2.
 2. Toschenko Zh.T. K chitatelyu // Sotsiol.issled. 2007. № 1.
 3. Nikolaev V.G. Sotsiologiya i ee estestvenno-yazykovye sredy // Mezhdistsiplinarnost' v sotsiologicheskom issledovanii: Materialy Metodologicheskogo seminara pamyati G.S. Batygina (2007–2009 gg.) / Otv. red. L.A. Kozlova. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2010.
 4. Rassokhina M.V. Metafora v yazyke sotsiologicheskoj nauki. M.: MVShSEhN,2001.
 5. Podvojskij D.G. Sotsiologiya v sovremennoj Rossii. “Neprichesannye mysli” // Sotsiol. issled. 2008. № 7.
 6. Shmerlina I.A. Professiya — sotsiolog: “khodit, pishet, izuchaet...” // Teoriya i metodologiya v praktikakh rossijskikh sotsiologov: postsovetskie transformatsii / Otv. red. L.A. Kozlova; red.-sost. N.Ya. Mazlumyanova, I.A. Shmerlina. M.: Nauchnyj mir, 2010.
 7. Kozlova L.A. Obschestvennoe mnenie o sotsiologii — vzglyad “s toj storony” // Teoriya i metodologiya v praktikakh rossijskikh sotsiologov: postsovetskie transformatsii. M.: Nauchnyj mir, 2010.
 8. Tezaurus sotsiologii: Tematicheskij slovar'-spravochnik / Pod red. Zh.T. Toschenko. M.: Yuniti-Dana, 2009.
 9. Chesnokova V.F. Yazyk sotsiologii. Kurs lektsij. M.: OGI, 2010.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review

Translate