CREATIVE ECONOMY: HOW LOSS OF KNOWLEDGE COULD BE STOPPED
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
CREATIVE ECONOMY: HOW LOSS OF KNOWLEDGE COULD BE STOPPED
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000339-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
144-148
Abstract

The author argues that private intellectual property (PIP) refusal and ownership by everybody of everything can be very useful not only for society in general, but also for private owners. G. Snowden’s and J. Assange’s investigations demonstrated how useless and senseless could be protection of intellectual property in conditions of developed information and communication technologies. PIP leads to very substantial loss of knowledge that could be observed on NASA Apollo mission example. Also PIP causes very significant damage to future generations’ interests, because the biggest knowledge protection is actually not allowing them use and improve existing knowledge in full extent. How loss of knowledge could be stopped and overcome? Very interesting pattern of entirely new interrelation practice is wikinomics – economy of mass collaboration. It means peer production, open innovations and, after all, network, not hierarchical organization. And these changes lead to substantial shifts in organization of society and economy.

Keywords
creative economy, creatosphere, open innovation, wikinomics, the ownership by everybody of everything, private intellectual property, NASA, NineSigma
Date of publication
01.03.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
489
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Buzgalin A.V. Kreativnaya ehkonomika: pochemu i kak mozhet byt' ogranichena chastnaya intellektual'naya sobstvennost' // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 8. S. 20–31.

Buzgalin A.V. Kreativnaya ehkonomika: chastnaya intellektual'naya sobstvennost' ili sobstvennost' kazhdogo na vse? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 7. S. 43–53.

Gehlbrejt Dzh. Novoe industrial'noe obschestvo. Ehkonomicheskie teorii i tseli obschestva. M.: Progress, 1969.

Dzhmukhadze A. Mozgi na prodazhu // Sekret firmy. 2007. № 35 (218). S. 46.

Kolganov A.I. Sobstvennost' na znaniya kak tormoz ehkonomicheskogo i sotsial'nogo razvitiya // Al'ternativy. 2002. № 1. S. 14–31.

Pavlov M.Yu. Formirovanie i ispol'zovanie tvorcheskogo potentsiala cheloveka v ehkonomike, osnovannoj na znaniyakh [Ehlektronnoe izdanie]. M.: Ehkonomicheskij fakul'tet MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, 2016.

Porokhovskij A.A. Politicheskaya ehkonomiya v XXI veke: sistemnyj podkhod v reshenii problem sovremennoj ehkonomiki // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii. 2016. № 4. 2016. S. 8–22.

Tapskott D., Uil'yams Eh. Vikinomika. Kak massovoe sotrudnichestvo izmenyaet vsyo. M.: BestBusinessBooks, 2009.

Chesbrough H.W. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.

Newell H.E. Beyond the Atmosphere: Early Years of Space Science. NY: Dover Publications, 2010.

Reach for Your Dreams Graduate: Recharge Your Life with True and Courageous Stories of Individuals Who Would Not Accept Defeat. White Stone Books, 2005.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate