Везде
INTERSECTION THEORY AND OTHER CHALLENGES OF CHILDHOOD THEORIZING
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
INTERSECTION THEORY AND OTHER CHALLENGES OF CHILDHOOD THEORIZING
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000339-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Leena Alanen 
Edition
Volume 407 Issue 3
Pages
94-97
Abstract
The author reflects on the possibility of applying the "intersection theory»1 to study the problems of childhood. An analogy is drawn with the use of this concept in research on feminism and the possibilities of its application in the sociology of childhood are discussed. The author refers to the position of Y. Quortrup on the problem of "intersection theory" in relation to childhood. Such a review will not only describe "multiple childhoods" – life worlds, identities, and experiences-but also provide a causal analysis of modern childhood.
Keywords
sociology of childhood, intersection theory, postmodernism, feminism, methodology
Date of publication
01.03.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
440
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bhopal K. and Preston J. (eds) (2011) Intersectionality and “Race” in Education. New York and London: Routledge.


Cho S., Crenshaw K.W., McCall L. (2013) Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, application and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 38 (4): 785–810.


Crenshaw K.W. (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum: 139–157.


Davis K. (2011) Intersectionality as a buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. In: Lutz H. Herrera Vivar MT and Supik L (eds) Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-Faceted Concept in Gender Studies. Farnham: Ashgate: 43–54.


Geerts E., Van der Tuin I. (2013) From intersectionality to interference: Feminist ontoepistemological reflections on the politics of representation. Women’s Studies International Forum. 41: 171–178.


Goodley D. (2013) Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society 28(5): 631–644.


Hood-Williams J. (1990) Patriarchy for children: On the stability of power relations in children’s lives. In: Chisholm L., Bu¨chner P., Kru¨ger K-H. et al. (eds) Childhood, Youth and Social Change. London: Falmer: 155–171.


McCall L. (2005) The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 30 (3): 1771–1800.


Qvortrup J. (2008) Diversity’s temptation – And hazards. In: Key Note Delivered at the 2nd International Conference Representing Childhood and Youth, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, 8–10 July.


Qvortrup J., Corsaro W.A. and Honig M-S. (eds) (2009) The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.


Susen S. (2015) The “Postmodern Turn” in the Social Sciences. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.


Taefi N. (2009) The synthesis of age and gender: Intersectionality, international human rights law and the marginalization of the girl-child. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 17 (3): 345–376.


Taylor Y. (2009) Complexities and complications: Intersections of class and sexuality. Journal of Lesbian Studies. 13 (2): 189–203.


Thorne B. (2004) Editorial: Theorizing age and other differences. Childhood. 11 (4): 403–408.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate