References

Additional sources and materials

 Berger Ya.M. Kitajskaya model' razvitiya//Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2009. № 9. S. 73-81          
 On zhe. Kitajskaya model' globalizatsii // Vek globalizatsii. Volgograd, 2009. № 1. S. 91-9
 On zhe. Esche raz o kitajskoj modeli razvitiya // Vostok. Afro-Aziatskie obschestva: istoriya i sovremennost'. 2012. № 2. S. 119-124.
 Vinogradov A.V. Kitajskaya model' modernizatsii. Poiski novoj identichnosti. 1-e izd. M., 2005; 2-e izd. M.: NOFMO, 2008. 364 s  
 ; On zhe. Kitajskaya model' modernizatsii: sotsial'no-politicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye aspekty. Dis.... dokt. polit. nauk. M., 2006. 367 s              
 Vinogradov A.V. Izuchenie modelej razvitiya Kitaya v Rossii v 1990-e gody //Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka. 2013. № 2. S. 137-145            
 On zhe. Kitajskaya modernizatsiya v sravnitel'noj perspektive//Sravnitel'naya politika. M., 2010. T. 1. № 1. S. 104-120        
 Vinogradov A.V. Prityazhenie Azii. Kitajskij opyt dlya Rossii//Tetradi po konservatizmu. M., 2015. № 5. S. 240-248.     
 Kondrashova L.I. Kitaj: k novoj modeli obschestvennogo razvitiya. M., 2017.           
 Pivovarova Eh.P. Stroitel'stvo sotsializm so spetsifikoj Kitaya: Poisk puti. M., 1992
 Ona zhe. Sotsializm s kitajskoj spetsifikoj: itogi teoreticheskogo i prakticheskogo poiska. M., 1999.
 Ona zhe. Sotsializm s kitajskoj spetsifikoj. M., 2011.
 Portyakov V.Ya. Ehkonomicheskaya politika Kitaya v ehpokhu Dehn Syaopina. M., 1998           
 On zhe. Kitajskaya Narodnaya Respublika: Poisk putej sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya (konets 70-kh -pervaya polovina 90-kh): V 3 ch. M.: IDV RAN, 1995
 On zhe. Shehn'chzhehn'skij kamerton. Transformatsiya modeli ehkonomicheskogo rosta v Kitae i razvitie Shehn'chzhehnya. M., 2017.
 Lopatina A.N. Ot «Vashingtonskogo konsensusa» k «Pekinskomu»//SShA i Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2010. № 9. S. 59-71;              
 Ona zhe. Ehkonomicheskaya realizatsiya «Pekinskogo konsensusa» v usloviyakh mirovogo ehkonomicheskogo krizisa//Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ehkonomika. M., 2010. № 4. S. 13-30.                 
 Sukhareva D.V., Morozova V.S. «Pekinskij konsensus» kak put' k modernizatsii i globalizatsii Kitaya//Rossiya i Kitaj: Problemy strategicheskogo vzaimodejstviya: Sb. Vostochnogo tsentra. Chita: Zabajkal'skij gosudarstvennyj universitet. 2014. № 14. S. 57-62;
 Vasil'eva E.A. Kitajskaya model' modernizatsii v rabotakh otechestvennykh issledovatelej//Izvestiya Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Barnaul, 2010. S. 26-29.                
 Shapiro N.A. Netipichnye vozzreniya izvestnogo sovetskogo ehkonomista, ili mog li byt' v Rossii «Pekinskij konsensus»//Nauchnyj zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya: Ehkonomika i ehkologicheskij menedzhment. SPb., 2010. № 2. S. 195-210;       
 Baburina O.N. Sanktsii i vneshneehkonomicheskaya strategiya Rossii skvoz' prizmu Vashingtonskogo i Pekinskogo konsensusa//Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. M., 2015. № 23 (208). S. 48-58.              
 Borokh O. N. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie diskussii v 2000-kh godakh//Istoriya Kitaya s drevnejshikh vremen do nachala XXI veka: V 10 t. T. 9: Reformy i modernizatsiya. (1976-2009). M., 2016. S. 661-663.
 Vystuplenie Si Tszin'pina na Vsemirnom ehkonomicheskom forume v Davose. URL: https://america.cgtn.com/2017/01/17/full-text-of-xi-jinping-keynote-at-the-world-economic-forum
 Degterev D. A. Politicheskaya ehkonomiya mezhdunarodnoj pomoschi//Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2014. № 4. S. 26-35;        
 On zhe. Rossijskaya Federatsiya kak novyj mezhdunarodnyj donor: dilemmy identichnosti//Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsij/NIUVShEh. 2013. № 2 (41). S. 69-85.                 
 Williamson J. A Short History of the Washington Consensus // Paper commissioned by Fundacion CIDOB for a conference "From the Washington Consensus towards a new Global Governance". Barcelona, 2004. URL: https://piie.com/publications/papers/williamson0904-2.pdf; On zhe. The Washington Consensus as Policy Prescription for Development // A lecture in the series "Practitioners of Development" delivered at the World Bank. Washington, 2004. P. 3-12. URL: https://piie.com/publi-cations/papers/williamson0204.pdf.
 Williamson J. The Washington Consensus as Policy Prescription for Development.
 Yu Donghua. "Huashengdun gongshi", "Beijing gongshi" yujingjizhuanxing: //Shandong shehui-kexue=Shandong social sciences. Tszinan', 2007. № 11. S. 92-96.
 Ramo J.C. The Beijing Consensus. London: The Foreign Policy Center, 2004. 209 p. URL: http://fpc.org.uk/publications/123
 Zhao Lei. The Present and Future of China's Soft Power. Beijing, 2015. P. 128.
 Ramo Dzh.K. Pekinskij konsensus kak soglasie natsij//Russkij zhurnal. S. 12-13. URL: http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/Rus_Jornal/49/10.pdf
 Yan Taoyuan'. Uvelichivat' myagkuyu silu Kitaya: izuchaya materialy trinadtsatoj kollektivnoj ucheby v Politbyuro TsK KPK//Ezhenedel'nye novosti. 004. № 6 (1060). S. 18.
 Borokh O., Lomanov A. Neosotsializm Khu Tszin'tao i sovremennaya ideologiya KNR//Pro et Contra. 2005. № 3. S. 20-39. URL: http://www.ru-90.ru/attachments/nps7528.pdf                 
 Ramo J.C. Op. cit.
 Zhang Jiakun Jack. Seeking the Beijing Consensus in Asia: An Empirical Test of Soft Power. Durham: Duke University Press,2011. P. 68.
 Eschenko P.S., Arseenko A.G. «Pekinskij konsensus» vs «Vashingtonskij konsensus»//«Ekonomka i prognozuvannya». Kiev, 2011. № 1. URL: http://hvylya.net/analytics/economics/pekin-skij-konsensus-vs-vashingtonskij-konsensus.html.
 Wu Yuanhua. Beijinggongshi, zhongguo moshi, zhongguo jingyan, zhongguo daolu zhibian: //Chongqing youdian daxue xuebao (shehui kexue ban) = Journal of Chongqing University of Postsand Telecommunications (Social Science Edition). Chehndu, 2015. № 27 (4). S. 1-5.
 Zhuang Junju. Guanyu "beijng gongshi" yu zhongguo moshi yanjiu de ruogan sikao: [Issledovaniya "Pekinskogo konsensusa" i kitajskoj modeli razvitiya] //Dangdaishijieyushehuizhuyi. Tszinan', 2005. № 5. S. 24-28.
 Re hua ti yu leng sikao (sanshisi) -guanyu "Beijing gongshi" yu zhongguo fazhan moshi de duihua: //Dangdaishijieyushehuizhuyi. Tszinan', 2004. № 5. S. 4-9.
 Chto takoe "kitajskaya model' razvitiya" i suschestvuet li ona voobsche? URL: http://www.rodon.org/polit-100312094446.
 LuoMin, ZhuXiaoning. Zhongguo fazhan moshi jiujing yinggai ruhe gaikuo -"Beijing gongshi" he you zhongguo tese shehuizhuy ililun tixi bijiao yanjiu: //Dianzi keji daxue xuebao (sheke ban) = Journal of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Social Sciences Edition). Chehndu, 2008. № 10 (5). S. 15-18.
 Tam zhe.
 Yuan Shan. Guanyu "Beijing gongshi" yanjiu de ruogan wenti: [Ryad problem v otnoshenii "Pekinskogo konsensusa"] // Dangdai shijie yu shehuizhuyi. Tszinan', 2004. № 5. S. 17-21.
 Galischeva N.V. «Delijskij konsensus» -indijskaya model' liberalizatsii ehkonomiki//Aziya i Afrika segodnya. 2014. № 3. S. 2-8.          
 Yuan Shan. Op. Cit.
 Liu Yangtang. Beijing gongshi de qiantaici: . Pekin, 2007. № 42. S. 102-104.
 Zhu Yaobing. Beijing gongshi: Dui quanqiuhua Beijing xia zhongguo gaige jieshili de fenxi: //Beijing daxue 041½.¾™, 2005. S. 15-19.
 Wu Yuanhua. Op. cit.
 PangZhongying. "Zhongguo tezheng de quanqiuhua" yu "Beijing gongshi": [«Globalizatsiya s kitajskoj spetsifikoji «Pekinskij konsensus»//Dangdai shijie yu hehuizhuyi. Tszinan', 2004. № 5. S. 15-16.
 Johnston A. L Stability and Instability in Sino-US Relations: A Response to Yan Xuetong's Superficial Friendship Theory//The Chinese Journal of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 4 (1). P. 5-29.
 Naisbitt J., NaisbittD. China's Megatrends: The 8 Pillars of a New Society. New York: Harper Collins, 2010. P. 127.
 Hu Jian. Hold High the Great Banner of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and Strive for New Victories in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects//Report to the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. 2007.
 Li R. Be on Guard Against the Ideological Trend of Neoliberalism//Guangming Ribao. Beijing, 2004. URL.: http://www.chinareform.org.cn/cirdbbs/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=2&replyID=86283&ID=38349&skin=1
 FangNian. Neoliberalism and the Argentine Crisis', in B. He (ed.) Analyses of Neo-Liberalism. Beijing: Social Sciences Documentation, 2004. P. 168-181.
 Kennedy S. The Myth of the Beijing Consensus//Journal of Contemporary China. China. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010. 19(65). P. 61-77
 Zhao Suisheng. The China Model: Can it Replace the Western Model of Modernization?//Journal of Contemporary China. Abingdon: Routledge,2010. 19(65). P. 19-36; Yao Yang. The China Model and Its Future/R. Garnaut, J. Golley and L.Song (eds.) China: The Next Twenty Years of Reform and Development. Canberra: The Australian National University Press, 2010. P. 39-52.
 Turin Dustin R. China and the Beijing Consensus: An Alternative Model for Development//Student Pulse Academic Journal. Cambridge, 2010. 2 (1). № 13. P. 48-79.
 Cha A. E. China Uses Global Crisis to Assert Its Influence: Along with Aid to Other Nations, Beijing Offers Up Criticism of the West//The Washington Post. Washington, 2009. URL.: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/22/AR2009042203823.html.
 Pan Wei. The China Model: 60 Years of the People's Republic. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2010. P. 67.
 Su Wei, Yang Fan, Liu Shiwen. Chongqing Model. Beijing: China Economic Publishing House, 2011. P. 1 47.
 The Guangdong Model: One Chinese Province Adopts a Beguilingly Open Approach-Up to a Point//The Economist. London, 2011. URL: http://www.economist.com/node/21540285
 Xu Jilin. Universal Civilization, or Chinese Values?//Kaifang. 2010. № 5. URL: http://www.qstheory.cn/zz/yjzy/201112/t20111207_128390.htm.
 Feng Chongyi. The Troubled History and Future of Chinese Liberalism//The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. 2010. URL: http://www.japanfocus.org/-Feng-Chongyi/3285
 Dickson B.J. Updating the China Model//The Washington Quarterly. Washington, 2011. P. 39-58.
 Li He. Debating China's Economic Reform: New Leftists vs. Liberals // Journal of Chinese Political Science. Knoxville, 2010. P. 45.
 Feng C. Charter 08, the Troubled History and Future of Chinese Liberalism//The Asia-Pacific Journal. 2010. URL: http://www.japanfocus.org/-Feng-Chongyi/3285
 Zhu Yao Bing. Beijing gongshi: Dui quanqiuhua Beijing xia zhongguo gaige jieshi li de fenxi: [Pekinskij konsensus: analiz provodimykh Kitaem reform v ramkakh globalizatsii] // Pekin press. 2005. C. 25-27.
 Tam zhe. S. 38.
 Kelly D. Chinese Political Transition: Split in the Princeling Camp?//East Asia Forum. Canberra, 2011.URL: http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2011/03/21/chinese-political-transition-split-in-the-princeling-camp/
 Zhou Chunbo. Huashengdun gongshi de pochan dao weicheng tixi de Beijing gongshi: [Ot "Vashingtonskogo konsensusa" k "Pekinskomu konsensusu"] // Sovremennaya ehkonomika. 2007. № 61(7). S. 146-148.
 Xi jinping zaishi'erjie quanguo renda yici huiyi bimu hui shang fabiao jianghua: . URL: http://www.xinhuanet.com/2013lh/2013-03/17/c_115052635.htm
 Zhao Lei. The Present and Future of China's Soft Power. Beijing, 2015.P. 15.
 Ibid. P. 27, 37.
 Doklad Si Tszin'pina s XIX s'ezda KPK. URL: http://russian.news.cn/2017-11/03/c_136726299.htm
 Yao Yang. Zhong xing zhengfu: Zhongguo sanshi nian fazhan qiji de yi zhong quanshi: . Pekin, 2008. S. 58.
 Tam zhe. S. 112.
 Wu Zengji. Lun Zhongguo moshi kechixu de tiaojian: [Rassmotrenie kriteriev ustojchivosti "kitajskoj modeli"] // Liluntantao. Kharbin, 2008. № 1. S. 5-9.