Везде
DISTRACTOR EFFECTS IN PERCEPTUAL TASKS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
DISTRACTOR EFFECTS IN PERCEPTUAL TASKS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Igor' Utochkin 
Abstract
Distractor's effect (stimulus which is irrelevant at a certain moment and ignored) on task solving efficiency is considered. It is revealed that according to problem situation and connection with target stimulus any distractor can produce two opposite effects: negative - interference and positive - redundancy effect. Distractor effects' classification based on one of possible grounds - distractor's source: sensory inputs effects, hierarchical effects and correlational effects is given. Possibility of level-hierarchical relation between the three classes of effects is discussed.
Keywords
attention, distractor, interferention, redundancy effect
Date of publication
03.05.2010
Number of purchasers
2
Views
547
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000617-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 11.11.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Ajzenk G. Struktura lichnosti. M.; SPb.: "KSP+", "Yuventa", 1999.
    2. 

  2. Velichkovskij B.M. Kognitivnaya nauka: Osnovy psikhologii poznaniya: v 2 t. M.: Smysl, 2006.
    3. 

  3. Gusev A.N. Obschaya psikhologiya: Uchebnik dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij / Pod red. B.S. Bratusya. M.: Akademiya, 2007. T. 2.
    4. 

  4. Gusev A.N. Psikhofizika sensornykh zadach: sistemno-deyatel'nostnyj analiz povedeniya cheloveka v situatsii neopredelennosti. M.: MGU, UMK "Psikhologiya", 2004.
    5. 

  5. Dzhems U. Vnimanie // Psikhologiya vnimaniya / Pod red. B.B. Gippenrejter, V.Ya. Romanova. M.: CheRo, 2005. S. 235-254.
    6. 

  6. Dormashev Yu.B., Romanov V.Ya. Psikhologiya vnimaniya: Uchebnik. M.: MPSI; Flinta, 2002.
    7. 

  7. Zinchenko T.P. Kognitivnaya i prikladnaya psikhologiya. M.; Voronezh, 2000.
    8. 

  8. Kaneman D. Vnimanie i usilie. M.: Smysl, 2006.
    9. 

  9. Uznadze D.N. Teoriya ustanovki. M.; Voronezh, 1997.
    10. 

  10. Utochkin I.S. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy resheniya zadachi po obnaruzheniyu signala: Avtoref. dis.... kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2006.
    11. 

  11. Utochkin I.S. Rol' prostranstvennykh i vremennykh ozhidanij v dinamike zritel'noj orientirovki: Materialy XIV Mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh "Lomonosov-2007". M.: MGU, 2007.
    12. 

  12. Utochkin I.S., Falikman M.V. Tormozhenie vozvrata vnimaniya. Ch. 1. Vidy i svojstva // Psikhol. zhurn. 2006. T. 27. № 3. S. 42-48.
    13. 

  13. Falikman M.V. Dinamika vnimaniya v usloviyakh bystrogo posledovatel'nogo pred'yavleniya zritel'nykh stimulov: Dis.... kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2001.
    14. 

  14. Falikman M.V. Obschaya psikhologiya: Uchebnik dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij / Pod red.B.S. Bratusya. M.: Akademiya, 2006. T. 4.
    15. 

  15. Fejgenberg I.M., Ivannikov V.A. Veroyatnostnoe prognozirovanie i prednastrojka k dvizheniyam. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1978.
    16. 

  16. Khegenkhan B., Olson M. Teorii naucheniya. SPb.: Piter, 2004.
    17. 

  17. Bartolomeo P., Decaix C., Siuroff E. The phenomenology of endogenous orienting // Consciousness and Cognition. 2007. V. 16. № 1. P. 144-161.
    18. 

  18. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects ofnoise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task // Perception and Psychophysics. 1974. V. 16. № 1. P. 143-149.
    19. 

  19. Garner W.R., Clement D.E. Goodness of pattern and pattern unertainty // Journ. of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1963. V. 2. P. 446-462.
    20. 

  20. Garner W.R., Felfoldy G.L. Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing // Cognitive Psychology. 1970. V. 1. P. 225-241.
    21. 

  21. Grice G.R., Reed J.M. What makes targets redundant? // Perception and Psychophysics. 1992. V. 51. № 5. P. 437-442.
    22. 

  22. Jonides J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement // Attention and Performance IX / Eds. J.B. Long, A.D. Baddeley. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1981. P. 187-203.
    23. 

  23. Klein R., Kerr B. Visual signal detection and the locus of foreperiod effects // Memory and Cognition. 1974. V. 2. № 3. P. 431-435.
    24. 

  24. Lambert A., Naikar N., McLachlan K., Aitken V. A new component of visual orienting: implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention // Journ. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1999. V. 25. № 2. P. 321-340.
    25. 

  25. Miller J.O. Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals // Cognitive Psychology. 1982. V. 14. P. 247-279.
    26. 

  26. Mordkoff J.T. Testing models of redundant signal effect: A warning concerning combination-rule regression analysis // Perception and Psychophysics. 1992. V. 52. № 5. P. 589-594.
    27. 

  27. Pomerantz J.R. Configural superiority effects and the identification of basic features in visual processing // Poster presented in Munich Visual Search Symposium, 2003.
    28. 

  28. Posner M.I. Chronometric explorations of mind. N.Y., Oxford, 1986.
    29. 

  29. Posner M.I., Klein R., Summers J., Buggie S. On the selection of signals // Memory and Cognition. 1973. V. 1. P. 2-12.
    30. 

  30. Posner M.I., Fan J. Attention as an organ system // Topics in Integrative Neuroscience: From Cells to Cognition / Eds. J.R. Pomerantz, M.C. Crair. Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
    31. 

  31. Reicher G.M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material // Journ. of Experimental Psychology. 1969. V. 81. № 2. P. 275-280.
    32. 

  32. Rueckl J.G., Suzuku S., Yeh S.-L. On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task // Perception and Psychophysics. 1991. V. 49. № 5. P. 412-421.
    33. 

  33. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions // Journ. of Experimental Psychology. 1935. V. 18. P. 643-662.
    34. 

  34. Swets J.A. Mathematical models of attention // Varieties of attention / Eds. R. Parasuraman, D.R. Davies. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984. P. 183-242.
    35. 

  35. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention // Cognitive Psychology. 1980. V. 12. P. 97-136.
    36. 

  36. Yerkes R.M., Dodson J.D. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation // Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology. 1908. V. 18. P. 459-482
    37.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate