THE SELF-POSSESSION SCALE: PSYCHOMETRIC FEATURES AND PERSPECTIVES OF APPLICATION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
THE SELF-POSSESSION SCALE: PSYCHOMETRIC FEATURES AND PERSPECTIVES OF APPLICATION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000338-8-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
The article describes the development and validation of a new measure called the Self-Possession Scale. The evidence for the factor structure and psychometric properties of the test is presented in the three series of studies with data from a sample of 678 subjects (325 males and 353 females) aged 16-68 (M = 30.32, SD = 10.86). Cluster, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analysis verified the three-factor solution: 1) personal self-possession (i.e., the ability to maintain moderation and composure in circumstances of everyday life); 2) eventual self-possession (i.e., the ability to maintain fortitude in difficult or unpredictable life situations); 3) existential self-possession (i.e., the ability to achieve harmony between oneself and the outside world in all circumstances). It was shown that the Self-Possession Scale shows good discriminatory power, internal reliability and test-retest reliability, and demonstrates the predicted correlations with total scores on questionnaire "Style of Behavior Self-Regulation" by V.I. Morosanova, Self-Determination Scale by K. Sheldon and E. Deci, Self-Monitoring Scale by M. Snyder, Self-Control Scale by J. Tangney, R. Baumeister and A. Boone, Self-Control Subscale from the questionnaire of volitional self-control by A.G. Zverkov and E.V. Eydman. We described the procedure of introducing the filler items for the correction of the social desirability, previously measured Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding by D. Paulhus. The results provide support for the Self-Possession Scale as a valid and reliable scale for measuring self-possession, which can be used in scientific and practical purposes, including the situations with high social desirability (e.g., when applying for a job, in the competitive selection, etc.).
Keywords
self-possession, personal self-possession, eventual self-possession, existential self-possession, self-control, self-regulation.
Number of purchasers
8
Views
718
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000338-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 03.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Aristotel’. Sochinenija v chetyreh tomah. T. 4 / Per. s drevnegrech.; Ed. A.I. Dovatura. Moscow: Mysl’, 1983. (in Russian).
  2. Gartman N. Jetika / Perevod s nem. A.B. Glagoleva. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’, 2002. (in Russian).
  3. Gordeeva T.O., Osin E.N., Suchkov D.D., Ivanova T. Yu., Sychev O.A., Bobrov V.V. Samokontrol’ kak resurs lichnosti: diagnostika i  svyazi s uspeshnost’yu, nastoychivost’yu i blagopoluchiem [Self-Control as a Personality Resource: Assessment and Associations with Performance, Persistence and Well-Being]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Culturalhistorical psychology]. 2016. V. 12. № 2. P. 46–58. (in Russian).
  4. Viktorianstvo v kontekste kul’tury povsednevnosti. Izvestija Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2005. V 35. № 9. P. 28–44. (in Russian).
  5. Zverkov A.G., Jejdman E.V. Diagnostika volevogo samokontrolja (oprosnik VSK). Praktikum po psihodiagnostike. Psihodiagnostika motivacii i samoreguljacii / Ed. A.I. Zelinenko i dr. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU, 1990. P. 116–126. (in Russian).
  6. Il’in E.P. Psihologija voli. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2009. (in Russian).
  7. Lokk Dzh. Sochinenija v treh tomah. T. 3. Ed. I.S. Narskij, A.L. Subbotin; Per. s angl. i lat. Moscow: Mysl’, 1988. (in Russian).
  8. Morosanova V.I. Individual’nyj stil’ samoreguljacii: fenomen, struktura i funkcii v proizvol’noj aktivnosti cheloveka. Moscow: Nauka, 2001. (in Russian).
  9. Nicshe F. Sochinenija v 2 t. V. 1. Sost., Ed., vstup. st. i primech. K.A. Svas’jana; Per. s nem. Moscow: Mysl’, 1996. (in Russian).
  10. Polezhaeva E.A. Shkala samomonitoringa i  ee primenenie v otechestvennyh issledovanijah. Psihologicheskaja diagnostika. 2006. № 1. P. 3–32. (in Russian).
  11. Horni K. Nashi vnutrennie konflikty. Konstruktivnaja teorija nevroza. Per. s angl. V. Svetlova. Moscow: Akademicheskij Proekt, 2008. (in Russian).
  12. Ayduk O.N., Mendoza-Denton R., Mischel W., Downey G., Peake P.K., Rodriguzez M.L. Regulating the interpersonal self: Strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. V. 79. № 5. P. 776–792.
  13. Baumeister R.F., Bratslavsky E., Muraven M., Tice D.M. Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998. V. 74. № 5. P. 1252–1265.
  14. Baumeister R., Tierney J. Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. Penguin Books, 2012.
  15. Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D., Tice D.M. The strength model of self-control // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2007. V.
  16. № 6. P. 351–355. 16. Carter E.C., Kofler L.M., Forster D.E., McCullough M.E. A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource // Journ. of Experimental Psychology: General. 2015. V. 144. № 4. P. 796–815.
  17. Domino G., Domino M.L. Psychological testing: An introduction (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, N.Y., 2006.
  18. Fitzsimons G.M., Finkel E.J. Outsourcing self-regulation // Psychological Science. 2011. V. 22. № 3. P. 369–375.
  19. Galla B.M., Plummer B.D., White R.E., Meketon D., D’Mello S.K., Duchworth A.L. The Academic Diligence Task (ADT): Assessing individual differences in effort on tedious but important schoolwork // Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2014. V. 39. № 4. P. 314–325.
  20. Gefen D., Straub D.W., Boudreau M.C. Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice // Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2000. V. 4. № 7. P. 1–77.
  21. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives // Structural Equation Modeling. 1999. V. 6. P. 1–55.
  22. Kuhnle C., Hofer M., Kilian B. Self-control as predictor of school grades, life balance, and flow in adolescents  // British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2012. V. 82. № 4. P. 533–548.
  23. Logue A.W. Self-control: Waiting until tomorrow for what you want today. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1995.
  24. Maisto S.A., Caddy G.R. Self-control and addictive behavior: Present status and prospects // International Journal of the Addictions. 1981. V. 16. № 1. P. 109–133.
  25. Mischel W. The marshmallow test: Mastering self-control. Little, Brown and Company, 2014.
  26. Mischel W., Ayduk O., Berman M.G., Casey B.J., Gotlib I.H., Jonides J., Kross E., Teslovich T., Wilson N.L., Zayas V., & Shoda Y. “Wilpower” over the life span: decomposing self-regulation // Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2011. V. 6. № 2. P. 252–256.
  27. Mischel W., Shoda Y., Rodriguzez M.L. Delay of gratification in children // Science. 1989. V. 244. № 4907. P. 933–938.
  28. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  29. Osin E. Social desirability in positive psychology: Bias or desirable sociality?  // Understanding Positive Life. Research and Practice on Positive Psychology / T. Freire (Ed.). Lisboa: Climepsi Editores, 2009. P. 421–442.
  30. Osin E., Boniwell I. Self-determination and well-being / Poster presented at the 4th International Self-Determination Conference. Chent, Belgium, 2010.
  31. Robb D.L. An investigation of self-control and its relationship to ethical attitudes in criminal justice personnel // Dissertation Abstracts International. 2002. V. 62. № 12. P. 4343.
  32. Schlam T.R., Wilson N.L., Shoda Y., Mischel W., Ayduk O. Preschoolers’ delay of gratification predicts their body mass 30 years later // The Journ. of Pediatrics. 2013. V. 162. № 1. P. 90–93.
  33. Tangney J.P., Baumeister R.F., Boone A.L. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success // Journ. of Personality. 2004. V. 72. № 2. P. 271–324.
  34. Uziel L. Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2010. V. 5. № 3. P. 243–262.
  35. Visserman M.L., Righetti F., Kumashiro M., Van Lange P.A.M. Me or us? Self-control promotes a healthy balance between personal and relationship concerns // Psychological and Personality Science. Online publication, 30th August, 2016. P. 1–11.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate