Везде
SOCIAL STRATIFICATION OF MODERN SOCIETIES: FROM ECONOMIC CLASSES TO RENTAL GROUPS?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
SOCIAL STRATIFICATION OF MODERN SOCIETIES: FROM ECONOMIC CLASSES TO RENTAL GROUPS?
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Viktor Martianov 
ORCID: 0000-0002-7747-0022
Edition
Volume 390 Issue 10
Pages
139-148
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analyses of change in determinating factors of modern societies' stratification. Global transformation of competitive market capitalism into rental model immediately affects changes in social structure of society. Reaching the limits of saturation of global markets as a resource repository of capitalism, increase of competition over resources determines the change of predominating mechanism of resource distribution: market is supplanted by directive distribution. Due to transformation of key factors of post-industrial economy contemporary societies face risig challenges to the foundational model of social stratification, based on market-based class aggregation and class relations. It is shown that optimistic attempt to stabilize conventional social structure by co-opting excessive working class (blue collars) into middle class (white collars) that is oriented to employment in service economy predictably failed since technological segments of post-industrial economy need no mass labor occupancy. Due to the lack of alternatives mass wage labor ceases to be income source for increasing number of unwanted people united within precariat concept. Protest activity of precariat can be partially compensated by social state activity: by strategies of gross working time reduction, introducing of basic income not linked to work etc. But this strategy is only possible in the most developed post-industrial countries. In the rest of the world strategies of precariat cooptation into dominating social order by opening access to various rents are economically restricted. It is posited that the new social stratification will be determined mainly not by the exhausted market economy interactions but by political and authoritative opportunities of different groups to get access to resources (capitals, wealth, rents etc.) that are distributed hierarchically. It is prognosticated that this trend will result in increase of alternative authoritative political factors of stratification (estate-based, neopatrimonial, rent-based) distributing the access of social groups to resources. In Russia economic and political power factors lead to hybrid model with market-based stratification which did not succeed to become dominating in post-soviet period is being expelled to periphery by neopatrimonial and rent-estate-based factors of social groups stratification.
Keywords
stratification, labor society, rental capitalism, social inequality, middle class, precariat, resource, rents, neopatrimonialism
Date of publication
01.10.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
522
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0132-16250000392-7-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 12.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo. M.: Logos, 2005.


Bek U. Obshchestvo riska: na puti k drugomu modernu. M.: Progress-Tradiciya, 2000.


Bessonova O. E. Razdatochnaya ekonomika Rossii: evolyuciya cherez transformacii. M.: ROSSPEN, 2006.


Bodrijyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konec social'nogo. Ekaterinburg, 2000.


Burd'e P. Social'noe prostranstvo i genezis “klassov” // Sociologiya politiki. M., 1993.


“Vice-prem'er: 38 mln rossiyan zanyaty neponyatno chem”. URL: http://top.rbc.ru/economics/ 03/04/2013/852256.shtml. 2013 (data obrashcheniya 02.02.2016).


Volkov Yu. G. Kreativnyj klass – al'ternativa politicheskomu radikalizmu // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 7. S. 84–92.


Evrostat. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (data obrashcheniya 02.02.2016).


Zaslavskaya T. I., Ryvkina R. V. Sociologiya ekonomicheskoj zhizni. Ocherki teorii. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991.


Kagarlickij B. Vosstanie srednego klassa. M.: Ul'tra.Kul'tura, 2003.


Kiselev K. V. Mif o srednem klasse: osnovaniya konstruirovaniya i politicheskie funkcii // Nauchnyj ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN. 2008. № 8. S. 355–365.


Kleman K. Trud ne na rabochem meste // Otechestvennye zapiski. 2007. № 4. S. 37–55.


Kordonskij S. Soslovnaya struktura postsovetskoj Rossii. M.: Institut Fonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”, 2008.


Mart'yanov V. S. Gosudarstvo i geterarhiya: sub"ekty i faktory obshchestvennyh izmenenij // Nauchnyj ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN. 2009. № 9. S. 230–248.


Pavlov A. B., Seleev S. S. Neformal'naya identichnost': statisticheskij aspekt. (2015a). URL: http://khamovniky.ru/upload/iblock/333/333b88766f5c1f3e7c918c67327eab00.pdf (data obrashcheniya 02.02.2016 g.).


Pavlov A. B., Seleev S. S. Fenomenologicheskoe opisanie sovremennoj promyslovoj deyatel'nosti // Universum: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2015b. № 3. URL: http://7universum.com/ru/social/archive/ item/2013 (data obrashcheniya 02.02.2016 g.).


Pankevich N. V. Logika kollektivnyh politicheskih dejstvij v usloviyah globalizacii // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Filosofiya. 2012. T. 10. № 3. S. 114–119.


Pek D. “Ukol” kreativnosti // Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2013. № 6. S. 172–190.


Piketti T. Kapital v XXI veke. M.: Ad Marginem, 2015.


Plyusnin Yu. M. i dr. Othodniki. M.: Novyj Hronograf, 2013.


Postfordizm: koncepcii, instituty, praktiki / Pod red. M. S. Il'chenko, V. S. Mart'yanova. M.: ROSSPEN, 2015.


Radaev V. V., Shkaratan O. I. Social'naya stratifikaciya. M.: Aspekt-press, 1996.


Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik. 2014. Rosstat. M., 2014.


Sennet R. Korroziya haraktera. N.: FSPI “Trendy”, 2004.


Solou R. M. Nesistematicheskie mysli o tom, kak vsyo mozhet pojti dal'she // Cherez 100 let: vedushchie ekonomisty predskazyvayut budushchee / Sb. pod red. I. Palasios-Uert. M.: Izd-vo Instituta im. E.T. Gajdara, 2016.


Stending G. Prekariat: novyj opasnyj klass. M.: Ad Marginem, 2014.


Tihonova N. E. Social'naya struktura Rossii: teorii i real'nost'. M.: Novyj hronograf; In-t sociologii RAN, 2014.


Toffler E. Metamorfozy vlasti. M.: AST, 2004.


Toshchenko Zh. T. Prekariat – novyj social'nyj klass // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 6. S. 3–13.


Fisun A. A. K pereosmysleniyu postsovetskoj politiki: neopatrimonial'naya interpretaciya // Politicheskaya konceptologiya. 2010. № 4. S. 158–187.


Fishman L. Zakat “obshchestva truda”: sovremennaya ideologicheskaya konstellyaciya // Politiya. 2016. № 3 (v pechati).


Fishman L. G., Davydov D. A. Ot kapitalizma k rentnomu obshchestvu? // Politiya. 2015. № 1. S. 39–54.


Florida R. Kreativnyj klass: lyudi, kotorye menyayut budushchee. M.: Klassika HHI, 2007.


Shkaratan O. I. Sociologiya neravenstva. Teoriya i real'nost'. M.: VShE, 2012.


Ekonomicheskaya aktivnost' naseleniya Rossii (po rezul'tatam vyborochnyh obsledovanij). 2014: Stat. sb./Rosstat. M., 2014.


Grusky D. The Past, Present, and Future of Social Inequality // Social Stratification. Class, Rase, and Gender in Sociological Perspective / Ed. by D. Grusky. New York: Westview Press, 2001.


Rotman D. How Technology Is Destroying Jobs. URL: http://www.technologyreview.com/ featuredstory/515926/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.02.2016 g.).


Sorensen A. Toward a sounder basis for class analysis // The American Journal of Sociology. 2000. Vol. 105. No 6. P. 1523–1558.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate